Laxian Key (page 10)

Squaring the Circle...

Question:  Wouldn't it be imperative to obtain at least tacit approval from both principals in this matter? Given the longstanding enmity between them, acceptance of so radical a departure from familiar norms and customs of warfare seems doubtful in the extreme.

Answer:  Curiously enough, agreement on the issue need not be a mandatory requirement here. In fact, both parties could initially ignore the whole procedure and continue on much as before. However, there comes a time when the areas of land so designated must reach something of a critical mass. At such a point, one side or the other might very well decide to go with what's on offer. Holding such clear and universal title to any major tract of this much disputed territory might prove progressively more and more difficult to resist. Thereafter, further violence becomes increasingly untenable. Fighting against a conventional enemy is all very well - but when that enemy is also a mathematical construct, the numbers themselves soon begin to outweigh all other considerations.

Write a new comment: (Click here)

SimpleSite.com
Characters left: 160
DONE Sending...
See all comments

| Reply

Latest comments

07.01 | 08:06

This solution is intended for humanity as a whole. Thus it is not possible for any nation to opt-out because, being autonomous, it would include all of them.

...
07.01 | 03:37

but we need effective solution NOW. Already 50 years late. Even if new government Israel on board, opposition would start civil war =collateral Arabs die first.

...
07.01 | 02:55

The Laxiankey option represents a form of human evolution, that of the past giving way to a future in which this conflict arbiter can be available at all times.

...
07.01 | 00:47

kill millions to prevent KEY land adjustments. Remember Bar Kokhba and Masada. Holocaust was a revisionist conspiracy to eliminate Diaspora as per Jabotinsky.

...
You liked this page